Minimal iso is worthless for an accessibility user and you would break the purpose of it by adding accessibility, it's clay to build from with the only bare minimum.
Adding the packages later didn't fixed the issue since there's a configuration (dotfiles) that manage accessibility. 2018-03-15 12:16 UTC−04:00, Samuel Thibault <sthiba...@debian.org>: > michael caron couturier, on jeu. 15 mars 2018 11:47:37 -0400, wrote: >> Skip since you obviously don't understand ... > > Well, if I can't understand, it will be hard for you to get any answer, > so we need to discuss so I can understand. > >> There's no accessibility in the mini iso, I would have used it, > > The mini iso doesn't have any .deb package *at all*, so it just can not > have any impact on what is installed or not in the eventual system. > netinst does include some packages, but no gui package at all, so it > should not make a difference. > > If there *is* a difference (which is not supposed to happen, and thus > there would be a bug to be fixed), then please tell exactly how you > installed with mini.iso and with netinst, so we can reproduce the issue > and fix it, because for all we know it is working, but as soon as you > don't pick up default options, there might be bugs which we have not met > simply because we can not test all possible options combinations. > >> installed gnome-orca and brltty don't add accessibility options. > > Do you mean that after installing with mini.iso, gnome-orca and > brltty were not installed (had you selected the MATE task item in the > installer, or installed MATE afterwards?), and that even with installing > gnome-orca brltty afterwards, there was still no accessibility option > shown in the interface? > > Samuel > -- Michaël Caron Couturier
