xavier grave <[email protected]> writes: > Hi everybody, > > I'd like to create a new branch (monotone one @ ada-france) to factorise > all Ada tools/utils we have around, for example : > - in org.log4Ada > options.ad[sb] > - in narval.core.pro > low_level_network-utils > get interfaces (for linux and freebsd) > get address > network_utils > > Do you agree on such new branch and how do you think we should call it ?
I'm all for factorizing but... putting unrelated bits and pieces together in a branch is not exactly factorizing, is it? If these bits and pieces formed a consistent whole, you wouldn't have to ask the question of how to name the branch, methinks. So, if you really think these should be in a different branch, I'd suggest creating several branches e.g. org.xavier-grave.options, org.xavier-grave.low_level_network_utils. BTW, how is options.ad[sb] different from GNAT.Command_Line (which contains a binding to GNU getopt)? -- Ludovic Brenta. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
