Thomas, --- "Thomas W." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > just for your info: > I successfully compiled linus-2.4.0-test6 for my > UP2000, which has > been so far the first 2.4.0 series kernel working > for me.
I have yet to get any of the 2.4.X series working for me, on my up1000 (or nautilus or it's more correctly known) > Hint: make dep does not seem to run make archdep > correctly, so vmlinux.lds > is not build from vmlinux.lds.in in arch/alpha. > Prior to make boot, make > sure to run make archdep. Are you using the kernel-package at all? I have tried: make dep make archdep make-kpkg clean make-kpkg --revision=custom.X.X kernel_image dpkg -i ../kernel-image***.deb > So far, I have not encountered problems. I would > like to give 2.4.0 a > try, since it fixes some things, I would like to see > fixed. I have not managed to get it compiled. I still get "arch/alpha/vmlinuz.lds no such file or directory" > Are there any good resons not to use 2.4.0 - aside > from the obvious > "it's certainly not production-release yet" ? > I have some rather obscure races and stuck spinlocks > in 2.2.14-16, which > 2.4.0 is apparently not suffering. Anything, I > should be aware of ? > ( The "rest" of my System is a potato snapshot taken > at a time > between test-cycle 2 and 3 - unfortunately, I seems > to take some time > until the 2.2 release appears at my favorite mirror, > and ftp.debian.org > is overloaded, as expected. grumbl ) > > Anyway, just FYI. > > Regards, > Thomas Weyergraf > Any help? > > > -- > Thomas Weyergraf > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > My Favorite IA64 Opcode-guess ( see > arch/ia64/lib/memset.S ) > "br.ret.spnt.few" - got back from getting beer, did > not spend a lot. > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Free email you can access from anywhere! http://mail.yahoo.com/
