On 2 Nov 2000, Andy Mortimer wrote: > I did try, some time ago, but with no understanding of anything > involved, it didn't go too well! Is there anybody on this list who > might be able to have a look at this for me, or shall I just stop it > even trying? > > At the time it came up last, Christopher Chimelis reckoned that it > would be a difficult job with the sources in the state they were at > that point, but I don't know how that differs from their current > state. If forced to guess, I would say they are probably worse! ;-)
I have a new lead on making svgalib A LOT more adaptive to the running system type (and it's sparse and dense mem bases). While patching up the new X, I realised that X is using the _bus_base() and _bus_base_sparse() functions to determine what those values are. This will probably prove to be a better method towards making svgalib adaptive in that way... I'll work on it this week and see if I can get it working (or at least compiling). I feel that this is a much better direction that any other that I know of... C
