On Wed 14 Feb 2001, Jon Leonard wrote: > > > > The point is that potato is "stable", meaning nothing really gets > > changed there. > > Aargh, man-db got installed as a security-fix a couple of days > > ago. Whoever Somehow the alpha package must have been botched > > (the i386 package is OK). I'll have a look at fixing this for > > potato. > > Maybe there needs to be a policy discussion on what to do with obviously > broken security updates? It seems to me that a system where the admin > can't use man may be some sort of security risk all by itself.
Fixing a broken security update shouldn't be a problem. Now to figure out where to upload it to... (it's already uploaded to the normal archive for stable, now it needs to make its way to security.debian.org) > Maybe we should call testing stable instead, if it's less broken. Well, if testing was tested more before the freeze, then stable would be less broken. Paul Slootman -- home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wurtel.demon.nl/ work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.murphy.nl/ debian: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ isdn4linux: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.isdn4linux.org/
