On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 03:50:32PM +1000, Craig Small wrote: > On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 03:08:56PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > > With gcc-3.0 -O2, it's a lot worse. The last loop where the fault was > > observed is totally stuffed, e.g., the loop condition is now the first thing > > that gets tested after (disk <= 0). > > > > -O looks alright. > > Not sure what one it is using here, but using gcc 3.0 I can get an ext2 > partition going, but not reiserfs.
It turns out that I misread the gcc-3.0 output. As far as I can see, it is actually correct. -- Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
