On Fri, 26 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The autobuilder is currently running on lully, which is more capable than > any of the other alpha machines available. Indeed, it is one of the top two > fastest buildds.
Ah, ok. I wasn't sure what machine it was moved to. Yes, lully is more than capable of doing both :-) In fact, I'll see if I still have a spare 18GB drive to send in to add to lully. Last time that I checked, it had adequate disk space, but more never hurts :-) Alternatively, if I still have the drive free, it can be used on another, more needy arch (it's SCA, so fair warning). > We current have three alphas available for developer access. faure (potato), > lully (woody), and escher (woody). I *totally* forgot about escher :-) Good point. Perhaps Branden (note the correct spelling this time, Branden :-P) is the best candidate for this one :-) > arm has one developer accessable machine rameau, running potato. There is > insufficient disk space for chroots for general use. debussy has the > available hardware, but has not been returned to the colo for several months > now. powerpc has one developer accessable machine voltaire, running sid. > There isn't enough space for chroots for general use, but given that it > runs sid, it isn't that much of a problem. Additional arm machines can > be accessed by contacting pb, the port leader, an additional alpha is > available by contacting rkrusty. Yes, I have access to both, personally (I own a ppc and have access to two arm machines now), so I'm covered, at least. I have heard others asking about debussy, though, so I was wondering how ARM was doing as far as acquiring more hardware. C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
