Thanks! I had success now compiling the kernel with gcc3.2. I also can use the standard smp kernel from unstable, and it works with the whole lot of memory and all processors aswell.
Greetings, Adrian. On Sat, 15 Mar 2003 17:04:25 +0100 Helge Kreutzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 03:56:47PM +0100, Adrian Zaugg wrote: > > On Sat, 15 Mar 2003 15:29:55 +0100 (CET) > > Joakim Roubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Sat, 15 Mar 2003, Adrian Zaugg wrote: > > > > > > > Now for many attempts I'm trying to compile a 2.4.x Kernel for my system > > > > and I fail. > > > > > > What version of gcc do you use? > > 2.95.4 > > > I had problems with the normal stable one, but when I compiled with the > > > unstable gcc it worked out allright. > > Can I compile it with a higher version and run it anyway on woody? > > (Sorry, I'm a real beginner in terms of compiling...) > > We also have a rawhide which only booted SMP when built with gcc 3.2. > And yes, the entire machine is still gcc 2.9x, we installed a gcc 3.2 > changeroot for compiling. But it has less RAM then your machine, > though, so compilation always ran through. > > Greetings > > Helge > > -- > Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys. [EMAIL PROTECTED] > gpg signed mail preferred gpg-key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 64bit GNU powered http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm > Help keep free software "libre": http://www.freepatents.org/
