On Sunday 04 May 2003 07:11 am, Craig Small wrote: > On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 07:35:43PM -0500, Kelledin wrote: > > I've been running an old xfs-1.0 release for a while now > > (1.0.2 iirc). It appears to be quite stable, on alpha and > > i386. > > > > About a week ago I decided to try XFS 1.2 just for fun. It > > isn't quite working so well, and I'm still trying to figure > > out why. I'm having the exact same problems as you > > are--processes tend to get stuck in 'D' state. I'm tracking > > it down even as I type this. > > I'm not sure, its whatever XFS that comes with the patches for > 2.4.20 off the SGI ftp server.
That would be the one I'm working on now--a post-1.2 snapshot made against 2.4.20. Bloody thing deadlocks just like release-1.2. So far I've found no way to keep it from happening, but I'm not done breaking its spirit yet. ;) -- Kelledin "If a server crashes in a server farm and no one pings it, does it still cost four figures to fix?"
