On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 10:43:46AM +1000, Samad, Alex wrote: > This brings me to my original question why isn't isolcpus working when I > boot with isolcpus=2 I thought it isolated cpu 2 from the schedular and > thus removed any chance of it running any tasks, threads etc.... Is this > as good as removing it from within srm, or is there a chance that int's > might still run on there.
No idea what this feature is. But if the cpu is bad, you *should* have it completely disabled via cpu_enabled. r~ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
