Another datapoint - I have a 2nd 164LX, runs Debian testing instead of unstable (libc version 2.3.2.ds1-2) - I built the same kernel (2.6.12.5) that is running on the Debian unstable system.
Threads clean up just fine, so I'm going to hazard a guess that it is not the kernel at this time - porbably something with pthreads in the unstable dist.? ...tom On Sunday 28 August 2005 09:12 pm, Tyson Whitehead wrote: > Humm. I'm running 2.6.12 and libc 2.3.5-4 as well. You program does the > exact same thing (i.e., leaves zombie). > > I wrote it up a C version to be sure (attached for anyone else wants to > check it). The exact samething happens. Even detaching the threads does > not help. > > Both programs work fine on x86. There is also some weirdness going on > with /proc. The x86 box (same kernel version) make a master entry for the > process (i.e., /proc/xxxx) and put the threads under the tasks subdirector > (i.e., /proc/xxxx/task/yyyy). The Alpha box puts them all under process > entries (i.e., /proc/xxxx). > > Weired. Is pthread implemented significantly different on the Alpha (i.e., > spawning full process instead of light weight ones), or is the kernel just > messed up? > > Later -T > > PS: compile with "gcc -o threadtest threadtest.c -lpthread" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
