On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 05:31:25 +0100 Falko Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 11:08:56AM +0100, Marc Schlensog wrote: > > > *click* > > > > I don't know if it helps, but IIRC the RadeOns (as well as > > Permedia3) seem to use a different addressing-scheme which is only > > fully supported on EV6 and up (at least that's what I think to have > > understood by browsing through c.o.vms). I'm having an XP1000 w/ a > > RadeOn 7500 sitting right beside me and no problems whatsoever with > > kernel 2.6.8 and 2.6.14. > > Interesting. That explains the poor performance, methinks. > The Radeon 7500 worked well in X but behaved weired in the consoles > here. Am I right assuming that in your setup it worked well in both > environments? Did you enable atifb? I'm running in 1024x768 > framebuffer mode. Yep. It surely did. 2.6.8 was running without framebuffer, 2.6.14 works fine with atifb. No problems with screwed up consoles, although it takes quite a while to switch back and forth (at least with atifb disabled). > > > > glxgears looks OK here and reports around 440fps, using 2.6.11.7 > > > and X.org on Sid. > > > > On which card? The 9250? Do 325fps on the system mentioned above > > seem reasonable? > > 440fps on the the 9250. Around 300fps on 7500 as far as I remember. > Are you running on a 21264A or 21264? In either case I'd say the > framerate looks OK. 21264A > Regards, > > Falko Gruesse von Stuttgart nach Stuttgart, Marc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
