And this patch was really simple (only one line...)! ----- Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Evans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, April 09, 2007 3:53 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Debian Etch .... > > Yeah, I don't see those packages in the glibc pool - have they been > deleted (or am I just missing them?). > > I submitted the original bug in in August of 2005 - since Debian 4.0 > still includes a 2.3.X series libc, why wasn't a patch to 2.3.6 included? > > ...tom > > > Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 10:59:17PM -0700, Mike Campbell wrote: > > > >> Um, I have 2.5-0exp3 from experimental installed: > >> > > > > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -l | grep libc6.1 > >> ii libc6.1 2.5-0exp3 > GNU C Library: Shared libraries > >> ii libc6.1-dbg 2.5-0exp3 > GNU C Library: Libraries with debugging symb > >> ii libc6.1-dev 2.5-0exp3 > GNU C Library: Development Libraries and Hea > >> ii libc6.1-pic 2.5-0exp3 > GNU C Library: PIC archive library > >> ii libc6.1-prof 2.5-0exp3 > GNU C Library: Profiling Libraries > >> > > > > Hah, dumb me, I managed to forget the difference in the alpha package > name. > > > > The latest version of glibc in experimental doesn't build on alpha > though, > > which will be a problem soon enough in unstable. > > > > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
