I was trying to boot 2.6.23-rc1 a few weeks ago. Asked about the newer
binutils - thought that may have been the reason it failing.
Glad you hit the kml instead and found an answer (and glad I wasn't the
only person seeing a problem with the 2.6.23-rcX series).
It wasn't a binutils issue, but that the stock aboot is misguided.
I'd also be willing to test a patched aboot.
...tom
Bob Tracy wrote:
I originally posted to linux-kernel w.r.t. 2.6.23-rcX not booting:
Unfortunately, I can't say where the bug was introduced, as this is
the first kernel I've tried on my Alpha since 2.6.22-rc7. Best guess
is somewhere between .23-rc1 and .23-rc2, based on changes to files in
arch/alpha/boot in that patch set. The problem happens early: aboot
starts to load vmlinux.gz, and I get an "unzip: invalid exec header"
error. There's an earlier error from aboot I can't quote exactly, but
the template from aboot (bootlx) is:
aboot: Can't load kernel.
Memory at %lx - %lx (chunk %i) is %s
The first %lx is 0. The last %lx is all "f"s. The chunk
number is 1, and I *think* the %s is "busy".
The posted reply was:
try http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/14/259
As it turns out, the problem was actually introduced with 2.6.23-rc1:
2.6.22 works fine.
The l-k people say aboot needs a patch. Question to Steve L. et al: is
a patch in the works? Would you like a motivated tester? :-) The patch
supplied at the above URL doesn't apply cleanly to the current Debian
aboot-0.9b-3 source tree.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]