argh ! it fails.
this downgrade remove  packages base-files and bash...
Should i use any option to force libc6 installation ?

thanks clement

# dpkg -i  libc6_2.3.2.ds1-20_amd64.deb
(Lecture de la base de donn�es... 65339 fichiers et r�pertoires d�j�
install�s.)
Pr�paration du remplacement de libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.pure64 (en
utilisant libc6_2.3.2.ds1-20_amd64.deb) ...
dpkg (sous-processus) : impossible d'ex�cuter le nouveau
pre-installation script: Aucun fichier ou r�pertoire de ce type
dpkg : erreur de traitement de libc6_2.3.2.ds1-20_amd64.deb
(--install) :
 le sous-processus pre-installation script a retourn� une erreur de
sortie d'�tat 2
dpkg (sous-processus) : impossible d'ex�cuter le nouveau post-removal
script: Aucun fichier ou r�pertoire de ce type
dpkg : erreur lors du nettoyage :
 le sous-processus post-removal script a retourn� une erreur de sortie
d'�tat 2
Des erreurs ont �t� rencontr�es pendant l'ex�cution :
 libc6_2.3.2.ds1-20_amd64.deb



Le mardi 22 f�vrier 2005 � 00:16 +0100, Sven Mueller a �crit :
> clement wrote on 22/02/2005 00:24:
> > i'm pretty new to this list (and in debian 64 world !), but when i try
> > to install libc6-dev i've got an error (translation) : 
> > Following packages have unmet dependencies :
> >   libc6-dev: D�pend: libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-20) but
> > 2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.pure64 should be installed
> > but i can't find the mentionned packages. I try to install libc6-dev
> > in /emul/ia32-linux and run ldconfig but gcc still not found stdio.h
> 
> I had the same problem after installing with a pretty recent netinst-iso 
> (a sid netinst iso to be precise). I found out that 
> libc6_2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.pure64 was installed while the archive only had 
> libc6_2.3.2.ds1-20
> Well, I solved the issue on my system by downloading 
> libc6_2.3.2.ds1-20_amd64.deb and installing it manually with dpkg. After 
> that downgrade, the problem was (obviously) gone.
> 
> cu,
> sven
> 
> 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to