Hallo John, I had the same promlem last week. Frederik Schueler has make a new kernel for smp. Hier is his mail:
---------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht ---------- Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.tzv.fal.de ([unix socket]) by dcs (Cyrus v2.1.4-Debian2.1.4-20) with LMTP; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 15:45:55 +0100 X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.1 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.tzv.fal.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C90F08300CC for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 15:45:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.tzv.fal.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dcs [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11232-04 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 15:45:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from defiant.lowpingbastards.de (defiant.lowpingbastards.de [213.178.77.226]) by mail.tzv.fal.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 306F88300C0 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 15:45:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from defiant.lowpingbastards.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1]) by defiant.lowpingbastards.de (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j1QEjXJ1013258; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 15:45:33 +0100 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by defiant.lowpingbastards.de (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j1QEjN83013255; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 15:45:23 +0100 Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 15:45:23 +0100 From: Frederik Schueler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Monika Strack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Valerio Aimale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alex Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: pre-release 2.6.10 kernel images Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3U8TY7m7wOx7RL1F" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at tzv.fal.de X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 tagged_above=-999.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Level: Status: R X-Status: NC X-KMail-EncryptionState: X-KMail-SignatureState: X-KMail-MDN-Sent: Hello, I have prepared kernel images based on hopefully fixed 2.6.10 kernel sources, wich address the problems you reported: kernel-panic on boot on amd64 smp systems. Could you please give the kernel image found at deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64/kernel-test/ ./ a try, there are unreleased packages based on a SVN version of kernel-source, and only intended to see if the SMP issues are fixed now. If you still cannot successfully boot the kernel, please send me a complete Call Trace, if possible. Thanks in advice for your help Frederik Schueler -- ENOSIG ------------------------------------------------------- -- ________________________________________________________________________________ Monika Strack Institut fuer Tierzucht Bundesforschungsanstalt fuer Landwirtschaft 31535 Neustadt e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Germany Tel: +49 5034 /871 154 Fax: +49 5034 /871 239 _______________________________________________________________________________ Am Dienstag, 1. M�rz 2005 09:57 schrieb John Rigg: > I've just done a new pure64 installation on my dual Opteron using > 19-02-2005 netinst. This went smoothly until I tried to upgrade to the > current 2.6.10 smp kernel > (kernel-image-2.6.10-9-amd64-k8-smp_2.6.10-4_amd64.deb). It caused a lockup > on first reboot with the following message: > > modprobe [909] trap invalid operand rip: 2a956ea248 rsp: 7fbffff818 error: > 0 NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP on CPU0CPU 0 > Modules linked in: ext3 jbd mbcache > > Subsequent hard reboot caused a lockup without the first line of the > above message. In both cases the lockup followed a long list of error > messages regarding various modules, eg. > ERROR: Removing 'trm290': Device or resource busy > There were so many of these they scrolled off the screen. > > I then tried an earlier version of this kernel which I had saved on a CD > (kernel-image-2.6.10-9-amd64-k8-smp_2.6.10-2_amd64.deb) and it works fine. > > A diff shows no difference between the kernel configs except the > earlier one has CONFIG_INPUT_MOUSEDEV_PSAUX_ENABLE=y and the new one > doesn't contain this line. > > The motherboard is MSI K8T Master2 FAR (VIA K8T800/VT8237) with > 2 x Opteron 240, 2 x 512MB RAM with chip-kill ECC enabled. > > Anyone got any ideas why this is happening? > > Regards, > John -- ________________________________________________________________________________ Monika Strack Institut fuer Tierzucht Bundesforschungsanstalt fuer Landwirtschaft 31535 Neustadt e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Germany Tel: +49 5034 /871 154 Fax: +49 5034 /871 239 _______________________________________________________________________________
