Hi guys,
is there any reason why you prefer powernowd to cpudyn? I was wondering because I'm using the later on my notebook. I barely use it on batteries, but I like the noise reduction that comes with the reduced speed.
Zachary Rizer wrote:
Aha! You're right.
Works like a charm here as well.
Thank you Thomas!
--- "T.J. Zeeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 11:06 -0800, Zachary Rizer wrote:
Please disregard previous email -- I just realized powernowd is only on XP-M processors, and that
what
I'm looking for is "Cool 'n Quiet".
My mistake!
Actually, no mistake at all. I have an AMD64 and run powernowd to have cpu-scaling (as provided by the CnQ-feature in the cpu).
I got it to run on a Debian kernel-image after I put powernowd-k8 and cpufreq-userspace in /etc/modules. It was apparently necessary to have these loaded forcedly to get the powernowd daemon to run.
regards, Thomas
-- Javier Kohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ICQ: blashyrkh #2361802 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
