On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 03:04:56PM -0400, David Wood wrote: > I don't understand. As far as I could see the problem you raised was what > a (finished) multiarch solves.
Multiarch was never finished as far as I know. > I keep saying it. There's a symlink. It's backwards-compatible! There is > no package building involved to get started! > > If I have /usr/lib > > and suddenly it becomes a symlink to /usr/lib/i386-linux/ > > What's the problem? Yes, it will take work to _finish_, but why haven't we > even _started_? Many packages/programs have hardcoded paths in them which will look in /usr/lib and not in your new directory. Also not at all compatible with existing software on any architecture. Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
