Why should he not change the link? Changing the link is what I did. Why should the link point to one version of gcc or another? If anything, I would assume that you would want to point it to the version that corrseponds to the version that the kernel was compiled against, if for no other reason that to avoid this very issue.
jamie. On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 04:10:00PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > James Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Thanks for everyone's replies on this. Much appreciated. I've built > > the module using gcc-3.4 and it's inserted into the kernel happily > > enough. (by changing the gcc symlink) > > Don't change the link. Set CC or similar. > > MfG > Goswin > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
