On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 09:09:33AM -0800, Larry Doolittle wrote: > Nope. It's not 64-bit clean source code. Besides, I'm > an old TeX-head, and TeX works just fine.
Sounds like a great choice to me. > Jo Shields wrote: > > or lilo/grub > > That's a strange special case, since I guess the BIOS jumps > to the boot sector code in 32-bit mode. I suppose in the long > run I could "fix" that problem by running LinuxBIOS. It isn't even 32bit mode when the boot loader starts. > How did grub manage to get built before the days of > /emul/ia32-linux? And that need can hardly explain libg2c0-dev > libgfortran0-dev. Unless someone rewrote grub in Fortran when > I wasn't looking. ;-) > > Will multi-arch make the situation cleaner or dirtier for > people like me who only want support for one arch variant? I doubt it would be cleaner. Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
