On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 12:32:35PM +0000, Chris Wakefield wrote: > I guess I could have made myself a little more clear. > I understand the 64 bit OO2 progress, thanks. > > I noticed that OO2 is not offered in any linux binary except those wrapped in > rpm's I was thinking that OO2 would come with the same installer as 1.2 > did....I think it was a _bin_ ? Anyways, I tried converting the OO2 rpm's > to debs, but ran into a few problems and was hoping there was a simpler way. > > By-the-way, I still don't understand why one would need to set up a 32 bit > chroot just to run OO when we have 32 bit emulation?
There are 32bit OO2 binaries in sid on i386. No reason to use rpms. Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
