Emmanuel Fleury wrote: > Mickael Marchand wrote: > >>well, the only thing I heard about having a native OOo on 64 bits was : >>"it' s just a dream, stop thinking about it" for months ;) >>so I am really amazed, it seems you did a really good job :) > > > Wow, don't over-estimate me !!! 8-o > > The people from Openoffice.org did the whole work for the 2.0.1 !!! > I did just glue the things together to make the Debian source archive > compile. In total, I must have had to fix three or four bugs.
well, you dare doing it :o) > > >>well, I haven't seen any bugs yet so it looks like a really good job, >>I did not even expected it to fire up when I started the build :) (hence >>my surprise :o) (well, I am not a big OOo user, just basic usage ;) > > > Well, this is also what I heard, but nobody did really tried... so, why > should we believe them ? :) that was my thinking this morning at 9am :) "let' s try to see what it gives maybe I can help somewhere ... ;)" I think I last tried with some post-2.0.0 stuff and it was quite horrible (full of compile errors ;) it seems they worked hard between 2.0.0 and 2.0.1, what's funny is that I did not notice portability improvements in OOo 2.0.1's changelog, maybe I missed it ... I believe the gcj people should also receive some congratulations there too :) Cheers, Mik > > Regards -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
