On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 03:27:48AM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Thanks. I'd read elsewhere that the AMD64 cdrdao was buggy, and the > patch to fix the bugs wasn't in either Sarge or Etch yet. I guess > that's out-of-date info.
It is in 'stinky-pete' archive though since the patch is trivial and the package maintainer has no valid excuse for having kept it out. :) At least that is my point of view on the cdrdao problems. I haven't used it much but it seemed to work here. Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
