-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 6 Mar 2006 19:05:29 +0100 Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 12:56:07PM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote: > > > eh? util-vserver is in the amd64 archive and works just fine for > > me. > > util-vserver is badly out of date (read the vserver mailing > list archives). Don't use it. Build from source. > > > There aren't kernel packages, that's true, but also not that big an > > issue, imv. > > There are kernel packages. See vserver mailing list archives. > > > It does depend on what you want to do but I've found vservers work > > very well for what I'm doing. > > I agree. Xen, vserver and UML don't all compete in the same > niche. And what would the both of your be "doing" with your vservers? (Just trying to educate myself a little bit more about the differences between Xen, UML and Vserver.) Thanks, Jacob -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEDIVdkpJ43hY3cTURAjljAJ4rtr56PYIOhHJ7Ch86CQQZRLHC8wCgolOG HeCzIVl5hupZ6JT57cCYvmM= =pc5J -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
