On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 12:45:29PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hmmm. Now that you point it out, I think you are right... My memory > must be failing me. After yours, which got my hardware working (very > important!) except for X, I did it over again with an etch installer. > That was a while ago. (or did I do a sarge->etch dist-upgrade?) My > kernel is is vmlinuz-2.6.12-1-amd64-generic. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -a > Linux april 2.6.12-1-amd64-generic #1 Wed Sep 28 02:05:15 CEST 2005 > x86_64 GNU/Linux
Then you must have upgraded after installing. Etch uses 2.6.15 last I checked. I would recommend upgrading the kernel. > So I guess the (revised) question becomes, what user-interface front end > to the partition editor was in the etch installer back then (and > probably still now). Well hopefully someone knows. > Or: is it safe to boot the netinstall CD and create a few new LVM > partitions without risking the existing setup by a slip of the finger? > The big advantage of the user interface is that it really does get all > the details right. Ehm, not sure about that. I have never tried. Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
