On Saturday 15 July 2006 12:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sat, Jul 15, 2006 at 05:22:19AM +0200, Francesco Pietra wrote: > > On Saturday 15 July 2006 03:34, Hemlock wrote: > > > > Now that it is clear which kernels are defective, what should one do > > > > with defective kernel on both i386 Debian etch and amd64 Debian > > > > etch? The list of Debian packages > > > > > > > > http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages > > > > > > > > does not offer > 2.6.17.4 kernels for these systems. Should one > > > > download from > > > > > > I'm in a similar situation. > > > I just ended up grabbing the source from kernel.org > > > and recompiling with debian's kernel-package package. > > > (kernel 2.6.17.4) > > > Did this both for i386 and AMD64 machines. > > > > Thank you for clarifying. > > > > Perhaps a naive observation: to save enrgies (and make a treasure of op > > competence) why not putting your deb packages (if they are deb) for > > download? Is any server that could accept them? > > This would, offhand, *seem* to be a job for Debian security.
Thank you for courage in saying that. But I know little about the policy of Debian to this concern, and, most of all, I understand that volunteers may lack the time at the moment for what seems to be the most economical (and secure) procedure. francesco > > -- hendrik > > > cheers > > francesco > > > > > Cheers, > > > > -- > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
