Hi. > Is there a significant difference at compiling between > using "module-assistant" and "make-kpkg modules_image" ? >
When compiling a kernel with "make-kpkg" and using the "--append-to-version" option, I couldn't make "m-a" produce a package that would install the module in the right directory (it doesn't take the "local" version into account). But... > I often read this solution with module-asistant. Is the old way orphaned ? > ... The "old" way works fine. :-) Best, Gilles -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
