On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 04:35:02PM +0200, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote: > > >You suggest ext3 for the / system. Why would I not just use JFS for > >everything? > It is often easier to repair have access to ext3 (which is > ext2+journal) from a system you have booted from a live CD, just in > case of a weird problem on the filesystem.
Would that live CD (or the etch install-cd) be able to work with a weird problem on the filesystem if its on raid1? Since the installer can install to jfs anyway, and my previous bootfloppies predate SATA so won't work, is this an issue? Are there other issues in choosing ext3 vs jfs? Doug. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
