A Dilluns 26 Febrer 2007 21:58, Lennart Sorensen va escriure: [....] > > Hmm, my x86 system (running sid) has a libGL.so symlink belonging to the > nvidia-glx package. Not sure why yours doesn't. I do have > libgl1-mesa-dev installed too, which nvidia-glx then appears to have > diverted out of the way. Without nvidia-glx-dev and/or libgl1-mesa-dev > you won't have a libGL.so of course since it only applies to development > in general. Any actual application should be using libGL.so.1
I don't understand this Lennart. Why do you need -dev to have libGL.so? and why, if I have nvidia-glx I don't have libGL.so and the libGL.so is pointing the mesa GL library? If I have a nvidia driver and want to use all the resources of the driver. Using the libmesa is a loss of the hardware. Probably I'm missing something , but I don't now what. Regards, Leo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
