On 01-Apr-2007 20:52.50 (BST), Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote: > Has anyone noticed that gcc is older in experimental for amd64 than for > other architectures. It seems to me like dependencies that go in circles. > If so, does anyone have an explanation? I wanted to compile the newest > version of openoffice but I need this version of gcc for that.
The packages in experimental don't seem to build for all architectures - another example is gnome-applets, which has been built for i386 only. Sometimes it is because of failure to build on that architecture. Sometimes it just doesn't build. Look at the per-package build logs at buildd.debian.org for more information. -- rob andrews :: pgp 0x01e00563 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
