On Thu July 12 2007 06:10:42 pm Douglas Allan Tutty wrote: > Are there other things that you find iceweasel does better than > konqueror? I don't run KDE, but when I installed Etch in testing, the > mozilla namechange was happening and it was confusing to follow so I > switched to Konq.
By & large I find konq works well for my day to day web browsing. I'm fond of gnome's epiphany, it's a very lightweight browser (almost no configuration at all) based on firefox. I get good results with it when browsing multimedia sites. > In Sarge, I ran mozilla, on a 486 so that was painful. I can imagine, I have an mmx 266 here that is now a server.. :) > I hesitate to try all the browsers since I'm on slow dialup (i.e. 28.8 > K). For just browsing (not composing), what is the difference between > iceweasel and iceape? Iceweasel is firefox and iceape is seamonkey, the full mozilla suite like communicator from years gone by. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
