tags 511594 wontfix thanks On Monday 12 January 2009, Marvin Renich wrote: > The NameVirtualHost directive is specifically tied to the > <VirtualHost> directive and should be in the site-specific file > (e.g. sites-available/default) not the default ports.conf. > > Currently, if you create your own site file that does not use the > default NameVirtualHost from ports.conf, and you remove the symlink > to default from sites-enabled, logrotate sends a daily email > containing a warning.
No, the NameVirtualHost directive is a server wide directive and not tied to one specific virtual host. It is however tied to specific ports, therefore ports.conf is a good place for it. If you don't want to use name based virtual hosts, comment it out. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
