On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 06:34:41PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote: > >Maybe it's also a bug in this early revision of the ARM710 > >processor. > > I guess it's possible. I'll try to find out if there are any known > errata for ARM710 that might explain the bug. Do you know what > revision the chip reports itself as?
OK, I had a look now. /proc/cpuinfo reports "Processor: ARM/VLSI ARM 710 rev 0 (v3l)". On the chip itself it says: VLSI-ARM / 9603 B560372 VY86C710A / ARM710a / ARM Ltd. Cheers, Richard -- __ _ |_) /| Richard Atterer | CS student at the Technische | GnuPG key: | \/�| http://atterer.net | Universit�t M�nchen, Germany | 0x888354F7 � �` �
