On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 13:44, Wookey wrote: > I assume you are using the machie I lent you ?
Yup. > I had a number of people erport that they can boot with 2.4 kernels (~2.4.5) > but not 2.2 kernels (~2.2.13), so on the whole I'd favour 2.4 for the default > unless we find something very bad. It's also necessary for kinetic support, > should anyone ever get round to it. We're out of time: the boot-floppies are now frozen for release except perhaps for ultra-critical bugfixes. However, it would be easy enough to provide a semi-unofficial alternative kernel (or indeed a complete replacement for the Easy-Install Kit) with a view to fixing it properly in 3.0r1. p. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
