On tis, 2003-12-30 at 21:34, Ron Golan wrote: > On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 01:36:39PM -0500, Ralph Siemsen wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 01:13:21PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > > > > > I had major stability problems when I tried 2.4.19 on my Netwinder (like > > > uptimes in hours, vs. months with 2.4.16). The main kernel-related > > > things I'm doing with it are using the Debian ipmasq package and running > > > X in a chroot; aside from that, just standard desktop/server stuff. > > > > There were some serious IRQ problems in 2.4.19 before 2.4.19-rmk7, > > maybe that explains your problems? > > I'm having good results with 2.4.19-rmk2 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -a > Linux harm 2.4.19-rmk2 #1 Sun Oct 13 19:06:26 PDT 2002 armv4l unknown > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uptime > 12:32:10 up 198 days, 23 min, 1 user, load average: 0.07, 0.02, 0.00
I use my NetWinder as a firewall, server type of thing. It's running 2.4.19rmk2 quite nicely. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uptime 00:54:01 up 121 days, 3:54, 2 users, load average: 0.07, 0.02, 0.10 P.S. I compiled my own kernel.
