On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 03:17:19PM +0100, Wookey wrote: > Yep I'm still here, and emdebian is not quite as dead as it web-pages make it > look. There was a lot of work on emdebsys oct2001-Jan2002 to get it to quite > a useful state. I am giving a talk on emdebsys at the UK Unix developer's > conference in July to try and get a bit more interest and activity. There is > one small commercial developer hoping to use emdebsys for one of their > projects (which I think is _exactly_ what it needs to get it to a > production-grade tool). I can confirm what wookey says. At least emdebsys is in quite good shape. We use it at university for a emdebeded system project and the results are good.
There is a problem though. The frontend relies on CML2 [1] which was part of kbuild 2.5 but was removed recently and is no longer developed. The backend of emdebsys is quite generic and only need a kernel config style file with e.g. OS_BASH=y key-value pairs. So before emdebsys can reach production quality IMHO a new frontend has to be written :-/ IMHO the CML2 frontend was always the weak point of emdebsys (whereas the snp-backend was the real strengh), because you had to do to much "by-hand" in order to include new config-options. I have some ideas about a new frontend (which could use more debian tools like python-apt, a Package-like description and so on), but other duties keeps me from working on it :-/ > Wookey Michael [1] http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/cml2/ -- GPG Fingerprint = EA71 B296 4597 4D8B 343E 821E 9624 83E1 5662 C734 You Know You've Been Playing Too Much Nethack When... You look both ways down the corridor, start to sweat... then realise you're looking at your EMail address -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
