Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 09:29:48AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: >> So the answer really becomes, that if your software does no floating >> point calculations, then the arm will be quite a fast chip, and >> otherwise it will be very slow. I would not be surprised if a 266mhz >> arm is at least close to the performance of an 800mhz via eden when >> doing integer calculations. > > Sorry to intervene but I am a bit surprised. > > As far as I remember, ARM has no 32x32->32 unsigned multiply and no > 32x32->64 multiply. Am I wrong ?
MUL is 32x32->32 both signed and unsigned In architectures 4 and above: UMULL is 32x32->64 unsigned SMULL is 32x32->64 signed -- Catalin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
