On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 11:52:44AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > The current glibc includes support for the arm-softfloat architecture, > using the patch that has been sent via this bug. > > What's the current status of the arm-softfloat architecture? If I > understand correctly, it has been more or less replaced by the armel > (ARM EABI) architecture, which is supported in the experimental glibc. > > I don't really want to keep this patch if it is not used anymore. > Moreover it breaks other architectures, so it needs to be applied > conditionally.
IMHO, if you're going to switch to an incompatible ABI anyway, you might as well just switch to EABI, with all the advantages that that brings. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
