On 4/23/09, Drew Parsons <[email protected]> wrote: > effectively what we have on armel is the situation where FPU_SETCW is > NOT in fact available, so fpu_control.h should not be defining it.
Thanks. I've submitted a bug report against glibc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
