On 07/06/2010 02:38 PM, Loïc Minier wrote:
>  During these chats, I heard other suggestions around a new port
>  notably, optimizing for much more recent CPUs such as armv7+.  Ubuntu
>  did see quite a difference by moving all the way up to armv7 + thumb-2.
>   

This seems like the right move, particularly since int-heavy code won't
benefit at all from this change. IMHO, what we really want is to take
advantage of features on more "modern" arm cpus - the user shouldn't
have to care if that's because of hardfp or thumb-2 or whatever else.
Suggested arch names: armfast / armfull ?

Cheers,
Brian Szymanski


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]

Reply via email to