Hi, On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 06:54:40PM +0200, Markus Kreiner wrote:
> just for the records, there currently seem to be two "good" kernels > out there: > linux-image-2.6.26-2-iop32x 2.6.26-25lenny1dma1 > linux-image-2.6.32-bpo.5-iop32x 2.6.32-23~bpo50+1 Something which is not clear for me is if the dma patch is also applied to the above 2.6.32 ? Or is it not necessary anymore (for whatever reason) from the performance point of view ? And, BTW, is this patch in the stock squeeze kernel ? (If I understand right, the 2.6.32 above is also for lenny.) I've installed the 2.6.26 (dma one) from yesterday on my SS4000-E (thanks, Martin!) where it runs well, but it's a lenny kernel in a squeeze install. > both seem to perform equally "well", 4 to 8mb/s writing to/reading > from the N2100 via smb, ftp seems to be a tad bit faster on > average.. I will eventually try 2.6.32-bpo, but I prefer a squeeze one if possible. Tia, -- JFS. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101022172257.ga7...@hohenhole.jfs.dt