On Aug 8, 2011, at 16:34, Andrew McGlashan wrote: > Hi, > > Jeremiah Foster wrote: >> I just have a "developers" model. Here's a link to a couple pictures of the >> machine I have FWIW; >> http://www.flickr.com/photos/jeremiah_foster/6021909246/ > > Grrr, no good, I don't want to have a flickr account and to see the pic, you > need to be signed in. Please give us a "normal" public link. Thanks ;-)
Sure. Here's a link: http://jeremiahfoster.com/trimslice/ Click on the thumbs for a larger pic. >>> They seem to be very, very cagey about releasing actual information --- >>> I saw a post by someone at Compulab saying they weren't going to post >>> scans of the PCB because the layout was confidential! --- but it appears >>> that the SATA port is actually connected via USB internally and so, >>> really, doesn't count. >> That may be the case in fact. Is there something like lspci or similar which >> would confirm that? > > That is very sad. > > I think we need a good comparison / feature / selection page -- choose the > requirements, then see the result: > > USB 2.0 ports ports yes / no how many [ ] > USB 3.0 ports ports yes / no how many [ ] > Fast Ethernet ports yes / no how many [ ] > Gigabit Ethports yes / no how many [ ] > SATA I > SATA II > SATA III > eSATA > > and so on ..... > > At least this will help research on what board is best for specific > requirements.\ Makes sense to me, would be quite useful for a number of projects since the Fedora and Mandriva folks are also looking at creating or updating their ARM ports. Regards, Jeremiah -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
