W dniu 23.05.2012 22:02, Tixy pisze: > On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 17:15 +0300, Riku Voipio wrote: >> If we really want to replace ancina quickly, we could get some >> i.mx53 quick start boards like the ones currently used as armhf >> buildd's. I'd like not to introduce new hardware models as >> buildd's unless they are significantly faster as the old ones. > > I may be being naive, but could an X86 PC be used with an ARM chroot > and qemu-arm-static to emulate ARM instructions? Or is qemu not > stable enough, or the emulated environment different enough that > package building would fail (e.g. through use of uname)?
I do not know how it looks now but in past qemu did not emulated unaligned memory access which were not possible on armv5 hardware - so you could have binaries which work in qemu but fail on real hw. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
