On Wed, 2012-11-14 at 22:20 +0100, Hoshpak wrote: > Am 14.11.2012 11:44, schrieb Arnaud Patard "(Rtp): > > Hoshpak <[email protected]> writes: > >> So after recompiling qcontrol and disabling the PIC watchdog, the > >> installation ran just find as expected. After the first reboot the > > > > Can you please open a bug on the qcontrol package and attach your > > changes so that it can be fixed for the other ts219 pII users ? > > I just did that, the bug should appear in the database soon. Thanks for > pointing me to it, I probably would have thought of it otherwise. > > >> modified qcontrol binary had to be added to the system and the > >> "watchdog" daemon from the repository is now used to keep the other > >> watchdog happy. > > > > on a side note, would be interesting to know also how to use the pic as > > watchdog but I guess it's lower priority than having qcontrol being able > > to disable it. > > It would certainly be interesting but - at least for me - not very > useful to have two of these beasts running around. Qnap probably also > had their reasons for disabling it in their firmware.
>From my POV (as qcontrol maintainer) I think a patch to turn off the watchdog would be acceptable for Wheezy but a patch to implement full watchdog support would be stretching the principal of a freeze a bit too much. Ian. -- Ian Campbell Current Noise: Iron Maiden - Rime Of The Ancient Mariner Q: Why don't lawyers go to the beach? A: The cats keep trying to bury them. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
