On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 9:49 PM, Roger Shimizu wrote: > However, I think armel is time to transit to v5.
As someone who can no longer run Debian stable on his MIPS device due to the CPU requirements bump in stretch, I'm not sure that bumping CPU requirements is a good idea in general. If there are actual benefits to v5 as the default then bumping it could be a good idea. OTOH the only relevant hardware for armel these days seems to be RPi, so why not make armel into armhfv6 instead? -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
