On 2017-11-07 11:08, Julien Cristau wrote: > Keeping armel on life support for 2 more > years is a significant drain on DSA and our hosters, for questionable > benefit.
I agree, that this support comes not for free, but the benefit is not questionable to me: There is still relevant hardware around which can run "armel", but not "armhf". *If* there are enough developers and build machines, there is no reason to drop the architecture prematurely. I can't see any relevance for ARMv4t anymore, however.
