On Feb 11, Arnd Bergmann <a...@linaro.org> wrote:

> I agree that changing the i386 port is probably a bad idea at the moment,
> let's see how the armhf port turns out and fix all the bugs first, as this
> is clearly needed anyway. Once there is a working armhf version with
> full time64 user space, there can be a separate discussion about what
> to do with the i386 port (phase out i386 before y2038, migrate all of
> i386 to time64 quickly, have two separate i386 ports, or something
> else).
I have still not seen any explanation about why we expect that 32 bit 
ARM systems will still be popular (as non-embedded) ~15 years from now.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to