Am Dienstag, 29. August 2023, 17:24:30 CEST schrieb Steve Langasek: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 02:38:20PM +0200, Rainer Dorsch wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 15. August 2023, 21:31:50 CEST schrieb Steve Langasek: > > > > How about alerting end-user that "did you know your interface name > > > > will change after the reboot thus possibly breaking your network > > > > configuration?". I heard there are certain Release Notes that were > > > > used > > > > to say things like that in the past ;) > > > > > > I think that's a very good idea. https://bugs.debian.org/release-notes > > > ? > > > > That would be an improvement over the current status. Should I open a bug > > report? > > I would encourage this, yes.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1050833 Justin followed up with a question: Are you saying that armhf machines still used one of the old interface naming schemes (https://wiki.debian.org/NetworkInterfaceNames) on bullseye, and hadn't yet switched over to "predictable" names? That is what I observed after installing bullseye and upgrading to bookworm. If anybody has insight why armhf did that later, please share there. Also any other follow-up discussion probably should happen in the bugreport. Many thanks Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch http://bokomoko.de/
