On 1/25/26 18:02, Michael Tokarev wrote:
25.01.2026 15:29, Andrea Pappacoda wrote:
..
But in case of postfix I thought it would not be necessary.
Yep, it really wasn't. But since a backport was already available, I
just installed it.
Ohh. I failed to realize the talk's about bookworm, not trixie, - even
if everything mentions that! And you're proposing to update it, not
to introduce a new backport for trixie. Heh.
And now when I recalled my postfix packaging, I also realize I haven't
pushed other changes to trixie which I planned - in particular, I wanted
to update postifx to 3.10.6 in trixe, with a few minor tweaks.
Not to 3.10.7 - this one contains a single bugfix which is already used
in debian (gcc --std=c23 bool type workaround).
So I think it might not be very interesting to put 3.0.5 version to
bookworm-backports, but 3.0.6 one instead.
I'm preparing a trixie update of postfix. But it wont happen before the
next point release, unfortunately.
Thanks,
/mjt
