Yusuke Tanimura wrote:
>
> * LAM is superior to MPICH? for PETSc?
It's only more popular. I don't think that lam has any
superiority to mpich for mpi1.x C programs. Except perhaps
that the usage is more convenient. I don't expect it
to perform better.
Thanks,
--
++++-+++-+++-++-++-++--+---+----+----- --- -- - -
+ Eray "exa" Ozkural . . . . . .
+ CS, Bilkent University, Ankara ^ . o . .
| mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] . ^ . .
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
